| Two tiered property marketing |
|
|
|
| Written by Travis Morien | |
|
"Two tiered" marketing is a practice where unreasonably high prices are charged for real estate sold by dodgy marketing companies. What "two tiered" means is that there are two market prices for a property, there is the usual price paid by locals on the open market, and there is the outrageously high price paid by people on interstate buying trips organised by real estate marketing organisations, using investment seminars as a way to get people to listen to a hard-sell sales pitch. People attending real estate seminars are given a hard sales pitch, based on the usual enticements of tax deductions and easy risk free profits from "bricks and mortar", and then sold properties at well above the going rate. In many cases the property is sold by the developer, or an associate, and is not made available for sale on the general market. They are only sold via real estate road shows. The following information was taken from an article on two tiered marketing in Australian Property Investor magazine, June/July 1999. Unfortunately, according to Iain Herriot, a senior partner with the Queensland real estate valuers practice Herriots Pty Ltd, the practice, which was first noticed in 1991, has grown phenomenally. Based on Dept of National Resources sales records, Herriot estimates that in 1998 42% of all settled strata titled unit sales in Queensland were two tiered marketed sales. In the same year, they claim over 12% of Sydney units were two tiered sales, and they estimate this may increase to over 30% in the near future. In Melbourne the figure was around 7% in 1998 and in Adelaide the practice accounts for 22% of sales in beach side suburbs. Herriots research indicates that buyers invariably come from more than 30km away from the unit, and that locals rarely buy at two tiered prices. The majority of sales come from within the state (just over half of QLD two tiered properties were bought by Queenslanders in 1998), but these sales come from rural and regional Queensland. About 24% of QLD two tier sales come from NSW, 12% from Victoria, 8% overseas and the balance from other states and territories. The practice seems to be catching in particularly in Western Australia and is a growth industry in that part of the country. You can recognise a dodgy real estate marketing organisation by their sales pitch:
I have been to several real estate seminars that gave this exact message. As a rule, I would recommend that you avoid dealing with any organisation that sells property at seminars or gives any kind of woop-de-doo "inspirational" message. If I was going to believe a forecast that a certain area was about to have a massive increase in price, I would be more willing to listen to someone who is buying in the area, not someone selling. There are hundreds of two tiered organisations floating around, many operating out of Queensland. Some have real estate licenses, many don't. One organisation that most people have probably heard of is The Investors Club. According to a series of articles that appeared in Queensland's The Courier Mail on 9 Feb 2002, this organisation is presently under investigation by the Queensland Office of Fair Trading. I have a particular dislike for this organisation because of the blatant dishonesty of them calling themselves a "club". I also have a certain amount of contempt for them, because after receiving their news letter for about six months I have realised just how amateurish they all are. The newsletter is a source of constant misinformation and anti-superannuation rhetoric, is filled with basic factual errors, contains a plethora of got-rich-quick testimonials and generally gives the impression of being written by someone that hasn't a clue about investment, or someone deliberately trying to appeal to someone without a clue. Many people think that The Investors Club is some sort of buyers collective or non-profit organisation (or even, dare I say it, a "club" of some kind). Instead, it is in fact a for-profit property marketing company run by a former bankrupt named Kevin Young. "Club" members point to Young as a great success story, pointing out that he owns around 150 properties. I don't doubt that this is true, because the "Club" charges developers a marketing fee of 6% (usually between $11,000 and $15,000) to sell their properties. This fee is not only much higher than most real estate agents charge, but the Investor's Club charge it up front, before the Club even finds a buyer! Young makes an estimated profit of around $4 million a year, which may go some way to explaining how he was able to afford so many properties! Developer's profit margins are usually very thin. If someone is going to pay 6% up front to sell the place they are almost certainly going to need to raise their price somewhat. In the Courier Mail article there were numerous examples of disgruntled customers receiving tens of thousands of dollars less for their properties than they bought them for - a two tiered trademark. Valuers involved with the club say that they are notorious for buying overpriced properties and then haggling with valuers to equate the valuation with the purchase price. An internal club memo attacks prominent valuers Herron Todd White for "incompetent valuation", while another leading statewide firm is chastised for its supposedly incorrect conclusions. "The club has trouble getting the valuers to agree to their values," says Joe Stone, a former chief researcher for the club in WA. "Kevin was always saying you have to lay down the law to valuers." Now I personally have no way of knowing if this is true, these are quotes from the newspaper articles. On the other hand, I get the Investors Club newsletter every month (after attending one of their seminars once), in the February 2002 issue there was this little gem: (In order not to be accused of taking a quote out of context, I have quoted the entire article)
Now I don't know about you, but this does seem to confirm, albeit with a different spin on the facts, that the club considers screening out conservative valuers to be correct and just business practice! Their reasons are a load of BS, but they freely admit to blackmailing valuers into accepting whatever price the "Club" thinks is fair, under the threat of having their work taken away. Furthermore, they keep a list of soft valuers that are somewhat more pliable (or corrupt) and use these exclusively. If The Investors Club is not a bona fide two tier marketing scam, then at least they share most of the same features. There are a few ways to protect yourself against this kind of marketing. Always get a valuation done by a reputable valuer (and not one recommended by the salesman!), this costs just a few hundred dollars. Only buy off a licensed agent with professional indemnity insurance. Avoid buying off anyone with a sales pitch that reminds you of what I write in this article, and the next one on "quacks". The Real Estate Institute of Queensland offers some excellent advice on how to avoid getting burned by overpriced property – not just for people buying in Queensland, but anywhere in Australia. Points to note...
Note: recently I received an email from a well known real estate author saying I was, in his opinion, spot on about two tiered marketers and my take on The Investors Club. He did, however, wish to make it clear that in his opinion the REIQ harbours more than its fair share of two tiered marketing shonks among its members. I suppose this is much like the Financial Planning Association, who claim that one can never go wrong dealing with an FPA member when in reality FPA members are no better qualified and no more ethical than planners who choose not to join. Both the REIQ (and other state real estate bodies) as well as the FPA primarily exist for the purpose of lobbying governments (often to oppose reforms that would favour consumers more than advisers) and marketing their members. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|